Quantcast
Channel: Pixar
Viewing all 340 articles
Browse latest View live

Disney announced all its movies coming in the next 4 years — here's what you have to look forward to

$
0
0

guardians of the galaxy gamora star lord

Disney provided some new info about its theatrical schedule stretching through 2019.

In addition to an ambitious movie plan announced last fall, the studio has called dibs on a few more weekends with untitled projects, including more fairy-tale adventures.

With the recent enormous success of "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," and the even more surprising staying power of "Zootopia" and "The Jungle Book," Disney really looks like the studio to beat. In fact, it's on track to have its biggest year ever at the box office.

Its lineup of movies includes a mix of animated films, superheroes, reboots, sequels, and multiple trips to a galaxy far, far away.

Here is everything you can expect to see from Disney from now through 2019:

SEE ALSO: 41 movies you have to see this summer

Picking up where "Age of Ultron" left off, "Captain America: Civil War" follows the new team of Avengers led by Steve Rogers (Chris Evans). A major incident results in a huge rift between Rogers and Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.).



It will be released on May 6, 2016, and is the kickoff to summer-blockbuster season.



"Alice Through the Looking Glass" is the sequel to Tim Burton's 2010 take on the classic story. Burton won't return to direct, but he has signed on as a producer.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Disney announced all its movies coming in the next 4 years — here's what you have to look forward to

$
0
0

guardians of the galaxy gamora star lord

Disney just updated its movie schedule through 2019. After the success of "The Jungle Book," expect many more live-action adaptations of your favorite childhood fairytales.

With Marvel, Lucasfilm, and Pixar, Disney is the movie studio to beat right now. It's on track to have its biggest year ever at the box office.

The studio's lineup of movies includes a mix of animated films, superheroes, reboots, sequels, and multiple trips to a galaxy far, far away.

Here is everything you can expect to see from Disney from now through 2019.

Picking up where "Age of Ultron" left off, "Captain America: Civil War" follows the new team of Avengers led by Steve Rogers (Chris Evans).



A major incident results in a huge rift between Rogers and Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) when the government wants superheroes to begin working with them.



We'll be introduced to a few new characters including the Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman) and Spider-Man (Tom Holland).



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Disney announced all its movies coming in the next 4 years — here's what you have to look forward to

$
0
0

guardians of the galaxy gamora star lord

Disney just updated its movie schedule through 2019. After the success of "The Jungle Book," expect many more live-action adaptations of your favorite childhood fairytales.

With Marvel, Lucasfilm, and Pixar, Disney is the movie studio to beat right now. It's on track to have its biggest year ever at the box office.

The studio's lineup of movies includes a mix of animated films, superheroes, reboots, sequels, and multiple trips to a galaxy far, far away.

Here is everything you can expect to see from Disney from now through 2019.

Picking up where "Age of Ultron" left off, "Captain America: Civil War" follows the new team of Avengers led by Steve Rogers (Chris Evans).



A major incident results in a huge rift between Rogers and Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) when the government wants superheroes to begin working with them.



We'll be introduced to a few new characters including the Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman) and Spider-Man (Tom Holland).



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

There are 4 hidden reasons Pixar movies are so visually compelling

$
0
0

wall-e pixar

Danielle Feinberg's work is so good, you'd probably never even notice it.

But that's kind of the point if you're a director of photography at Pixar, where one of Feinberg's most important jobs is adding the appropriate lighting to a film. Without Feinberg's touch, films such as "Wall-E,""Brave," and "Monsters, Inc.," wouldn't be nearly as rich or complex.

Feinberg recently gave a TED talk in which she described this delicate art, and she shared with Tech Insider four key considerations that make a film magical.

 

1. Color

Pixar movies are not dull. They burst with color, and masterfully use each hue to tell stories.

Feinberg points to "Wall-E," a movie about a lonely robot that finds love. The movie doesn't use dialogue in the first 40 minutes of the film, so Feinberg had to find a way to communicate where Wall-E lived without words.

"We realized very quickly that if we let things go too red — the clouds, the dust, the atmosphere — it began to look like Mars," she says. "We all seem to have this ingrained notion that red equals Mars. So I had to be very careful to keep the colors of that monochromatic version of Earth in the whites, yellows, and oranges but never let it get too red."

Here are a few shots, known as progression images in lighting designer lingo, that show how the various color schemes for "Wall-E" changed over time. What begins as gray and overcast, but otherwise ordinary, ends up as a smog-filled wasteland.

wall ewall e1wall e2

The final result is clearly dystopian, but still suggests that Wall-E is living on Earth.

"Every department is helping to tell the story," Feinberg says, "but here just small changes in the color of the lighting could have ruined everything" by confusing the audience about something as basic as which planet the story is set on.



2. Nature

Unlike movies that take place on land, where creating the look of air only involves some haze or wisps of wind, creating believable underwater scenes presented a unique challenge for Feinberg while working on the 2003 film "Finding Nemo."

Feinberg had to find a way to situate audience inside Australia's Great Barrier Reef without dialing up the colors too much, in order to preserve the actual look of the ocean. One tool the team has, she says, is a light they call "murk."

"We use it to set the visibility of the water [by] decontrasting the objects as we go away from the camera, until they are the same contrast as surrounding things," Feinberg says, "so you can't make out any detail thus losing visibility and the color."

A good example of that is the scene in which Nemo and company are riding the East Australian Current (EAC) as if it were a giant underwater roller coaster.

turtle Crush finding nemo"With the turtles riding the East Australian Current, we set the visibility of the water to be much deeper than you would ever see in real life, to help tell the story, by showing the EAC and what it is the turtles are in for their roller coaster ride," Feinberg says.

"With 'Nemo,' the lighting is not only setting up the world that is critical to the story," she adds, "but also able to set the mood without impacting the believability of the world for the audience."



3. Theme

Sometimes lighting cues can add to the tone of the overall story. Happy stories aren't set in darkness. They're bright and cheery.

In the 2012 film "Brave," Feinberg had to find a way to convey Merida's uncertainty and trepidation through the film's lighting, all while making considerations for where the story takes place.

"The lighting design I came up with for the scenes in the forest had all the light cutting off outside a little area we set up around the characters and action," she says. "The Scottish mist then hung around these dark silhouettes of trees and vegetation in the distance."

Brave Pixar

Visually, this helped calm "the busyness of the forest," but also made it easier for the audience to understand the story thematically.

"It helps with the idea that there are a lot of unknowns in that forest — magic, bears, witches," says Feinberg. "It is also the place where our main character, Merida, is figuring out who she is going to be in the world, venturing out into the great unknown of the forest and adulthood."



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Marvel has 9 more superhero movies planned after 'Captain America: Civil War' — Here they all are

$
0
0

captain america civil war

"Captain America: Civil War" is a runaway hit for Disney, with fans, critics, and comic purists applauding the packed action spectacle. 

"Civil War" ignites tensions between Captain America and Iron Man, eventually drawing in comic legends Black Panther and Spider-Man, both with substantial roles in the film. The pair are only the beginning of the new class of Marvel heroes coming over the next few years. 

Here are the superhero films coming from Marvel and Disney from now through 2019:

The first film coming after "Civil War" is "Doctor Strange," with "Sherlock" star Benedict Cumberbatch set to star as Dr. Stephen Strange.



Strange is a talented and arrogant neurosurgeon, but loses the ability to perform surgery after a terrible car accident injures his hands.



Desperate to recover his talents, Strange wanders the world, eventually coming to Tibet. There, he becomes a pupil of the Ancient One (Tilda Swanton), an immensely powerful magical being who changes his destiny.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Disney stopped making games because it doesn't understand how to make games

$
0
0

Disney is the biggest, most important entertainment company in the world.

These are the folks behind Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck, yes, but it's also the same company that now owns Marvel, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, and every other blockbuster franchise. Disney owns multiple TV networks, including ABC and ESPN (!!). Disney owns Pixar. Disney even owns one-third of Hulu, the streaming network.

star wars force awakens trailer

There is no overstating how massive and influential Disney — the corporation — is when it comes to entertainment. Regardless of these facts, Disney officially killed off its in-house video game production on Tuesday.

With that news comes the death of "Disney Infinity," the company's massively popular game series where players buy physical toys and are able to play with those characters in-game. It was essentially a virtual sandbox that allowed Disney to sell toys for its entire catalog of properties, from Darth Vader to Iron Man. In ending "Infinity," Disney's taking a $174 million hit. Yikes!

The bigger news, however, is that Disney's moving away from video game production entirely; the company will license its properties to video game developers and publishers going forward. Think more stuff like "Star Wars Battlefront," less stuff like "Disney Infinity." 

So, why is the biggest entertainment company in the world walking away from an entire medium?

darth vader disney infinity

"We feel like we’re better off managing the risk that the business delivers by licensing instead of publishing," Disney CEO Bob Iger said in the investor call where the news was announced.

In plain English: Video games are financially risky, and it's easier to let other companies pay us for the right to make video games based on our properties than to make our own.

Iger's not wrong — like so many virtual battlefields, the video game landscape is littered with the corpses of dead studios and publishers. Disney would know, as it purchased and subsequently shut down a whole mess of these game studios itself. Here's a short list:

  • Junction Point Studios, makers of the "Epic Mickey" series
  • Propaganda Games, makers of "Tron: Evolution" (and a canceled "Pirates of the Caribbean" game)
  • Black Rock Studio, makers of "Pure" and "Split/Second"
  • LucasArts, makers of the "Monkey Island" series, the "Maniac Mansion" series, and literally dozens of others
  • Wideload Games, makers of "Guilty Pary"
  • Avalanche Software, makers of "Disney Infinity"

Between 2005 and 2016, Disney bought a half dozen game studios and then closed them all. It was part of a bigger push into video games — a push that Disney never fully got behind, which resulted in a half dozen studios (with hundreds of employees) being closed. 

The Secret of Monkey Island

Though Disney is in the entertainment business, the company seemingly never grasped how to operate in the realm of video games. "That business is a changing business and we did not have enough confidence in the business," Iger said on this week's call.

Video games are, indeed, a changing business. But so is film and television. Just think about how much has changed in the world of TV since 2010, let alone since 2005. 

The issue isn't that games are a changing business, it's that Disney doesn't understand how to operate in that business. Let's look at the case of "Split/Second," an excellent racing game created by Disney's Black Rock Studio. The game launched on May 18, 2010 — the same day that juggernaut "Red Dead Redemption" was released. It launched one week before another, very similar racing game named "Blur" launched. 

This could just be chocked up to bad luck, but a publisher that understood the video game industry would've made sure to get out of the way of anything released by Rockstar Games, the makers of "Red Dead Redemption" (and 800-lb gorilla "Grand Theft Auto"). 

red dead redemption

This seeming lack of logical operations can be applied to instance after instance of Disney investing in a big game only to make a major misstep as it crossed the finish line. "Disney Infinity" is the latest example of that.

As Kotaku's Mike Fahey points out in an incisive headline: "Disney Infinity Died Just As It Was Getting Good." Indeed, this statement can be applied to many of Disney's failed video game projects across the past decade. Instead of actually fixing the problem, Disney chose instead to abandon an entire entertainment medium.

SEE ALSO: Here's what it was like to watch the first major Hyperloop test

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Apple’s new ‘true tone’ iPad feature changes the display color based on the light around you

Why an Oscar-winning Pixar director gets nervous when everything is going right

$
0
0

andrew stanton pixar

Pixar director Andrew Stanton isn't afraid to fail.

In the 2014 book "Creativity, Inc.," Pixar Animation and Disney Animation president Ed Catmull explains that Stanton has a unique perspective on failure — and in fact, he gets anxious when things go right.

"It's gotten to the point that we get worried if a film is not a problem child right away," Stanton tells Catmull. "It makes us nervous.

We've come to recognize the signs of invention — of dealing with originality. We have begun to welcome the feeling of, 'Oh, we've never had this exact problem — and it's incredibly recalcitrant and won't do what we want it to do.' That's familiar territory — in a good way."

Catmull explains that Stanton, who won Academy Awards for his direction of the film "Wall-E" in 2008 as well as for "Finding Nemo" in 2004, both expects some degree of failure and embraces it. Catmull writes:

Andrew is fond of saying that people need to be wrong as fast as they can. In a battle, if you're faced with two hills and you're unsure which one to attack, he says, the right course of action is to hurry up and choose. If you find out it's the wrong hill, turn around and attack the other one. In that scenario, the only unacceptable course of action is running between the hills.

Stanton isn't the only successful person who finds a degree of failure integral to success. Google's SVP of people operations Laszlo Bock said managers at the tech giant are trained to spend just as much time discussing employees' failures as their successes. "By making conversation about misses normal, you end up actually driving lots of improvement in the organization" he told Kris Duggan, CEO of software company BetterWorks.

"Failure is not the opposite of success; it's a stepping stone to success," Huffington Post CEO Arianna Huffington told Business Insider's Rachel Gillett her mother often counseled her. "I think our resilience is dramatically improved when we trust that often out of the biggest heartbreaks come the best things in our lives."

As Stanton tells Catmull, "You wouldn't say to somebody who is first learning to play the guitar, 'You better think really hard about where you put your fingers on the guitar neck before you strum, because you only get to strum once, and that's it. And if you get that wrong, we're going to move on.' That's no way to learn, is it?"

SEE ALSO: A former Disney exec explains how to bounce back from failure

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: EX-FBI HOSTAGE NEGOTIATOR: Here's the best way to spot a liar

RANKED: Every Pixar movie from worst to best

$
0
0

pixar logo

Not since Walt Disney has there been a figure in the animation world who has transcended the medium like John Lasseter and the studio he oversees, Pixar.

Yes, Jeffrey Katzenberg and DreamWorks Animation had their time, but for over 20 years, Lasseter's Pixar has consistently put out box-office hits (the company has earned close to $10 billion worldwide) and created stories that affect us on an emotional level that we can't wait to experience again and again.

From the "you've got a friend" tale of the "Toy Story" movies to a commentary on how we need to protect our planet in the multilayered "WALL-E," Pixar movies are much more than kids movies or cartoons. Which is exactly how ol' Walt went about it.

As we get ready for Pixar's latest, the sequel "Finding Dory" (out June 17), we've taken on the gargantuan task of ranking all 16 Pixar releases — scroll down to find out the best.

SEE ALSO: 18 movies that never got a sequel but deserve one

16. 'Cars 2' (2011)

Taking Lightning McQueen (voiced by Owen Wilson) and Mater (Larry the Cable Guy) away from Radiator Springs and going international (plus making Mater a spy) didn't grab critics. This sequel became the first "rotten" Pixar movie on Rotten Tomatoes. Deservedly.

  



15. 'A Bug’s Life' (1998)

In the second movie ever released by Pixar, an ant named Flik (voiced by Dave Foley) sets out to find others to help save his colony against grasshoppers and ends up recruiting a unique group of allies.

Though the movie was successful at the box office, with the release of DreamWorks' "Antz" a month earlier, you're more likely to remember the Lasseter-Katzenberg feud than the films. 

 



14. 'The Good Dinosaur' (2015)

Perhaps one of the more serious stories in the Pixar inventory, this coming-of-age tale about an Apatosaurus and his human friend Spot trying to return home didn't catch on nearly as much as Pixar's other release in 2015, "Inside Out."

Burnout may have been at play here, but mostly Pixar challenged its core audience with a darker story than they were used to.

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Use a trick from an Oscar-winning Pixar director to recalibrate when it feels like everything is going wrong

$
0
0

pete docter pixar oscar

Pete Docter knows what it's like to have things go right.

He's won two Academy Awards for his direction of 2009 film "Up" and 2015 film "Inside Out," and has been nominated for four more.

But that doesn't mean he never feels like everything is going wrong.

In the 2014 book "Creativity, Inc.," Pixar Animation and Disney Animation president Ed Catmull recounts the difficult production process of "Up." Catmull writes that Pixar's tenth film went through four iterations, and that only two things ultimately lasted from the original version, including its title.

Docter was the director throughout the process, which took years of major changes. "The path he followed on 'Up' was difficult and unpredictable; there was nothing about where the movie started that indicated where it would end up," Catmull writes. Because of its fluidity, the team "had to be able to roll with that evolution without panicking, shutting down, or growing discouraged. It helped that Pete understood what they were feeling."

 Docter told Catmull:

When this happens, it's usually because I feel like the world is crashing down and all is lost. One trick I've learned is to force myself to make a list of what's actually wrong. Usually, soon into making the list, I find I can group most of the issues into two or three larger all-encompassing problems. So it's really not all that bad. Having a finite list of problems is much better than having an illogical feeling that everything is wrong.

Docter's strategy is one anyone can adopt, and its benefits are twofold: First, it's reassuring to narrow down your problems from "everything" to the actual issues. And second, it's a productive step toward solving them.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This guy earned $25,000 worth of airline miles by buying pudding cups

16 hidden secrets in Disney and Pixar movies that actually exist in real life

$
0
0

finding dory

Pixar's newest movie, "Finding Dory," is in theaters Friday. 

If you're a true Disney and Pixar fan, you're probably not only excited for the sequel to 2005's "Finding Nemo," but also for the barrage of Easter eggs that are certain to be hiding in plain sight.

An Easter egg, as it relates to movies, is when the movie's creators hide something in the film that's an intentional inside joke. 

John Lasseter, cofounder of Pixar and now overseer of all animation projects at Disney, is no stranger to the Easter egg world. Both of the companies he's led, particularly Pixar, have included dozens of Easter eggs in their movies. For instance, nearly every Pixar movie is known to include a hidden Pizza Planet truck from "Toy Story."

Other Easter eggs are based on real-world locations. There are obvious ones — in the beginning of the 2006 movie "Cars," the announcer says the entire town of Emeryville will be closed for the race; Pixar Studios is in Emeryville, California — but some Easter eggs aren't so obvious. 

Keep reading to see more real-life Easter eggs in Disney and Pixar films.

Karyne Levy contributed to a previous version of this story.

References to A113.

Perhaps the most famous of all the Pixar Easter eggs are references to A113. References to A113 can be found in all Pixar movies, some Disney movies, and even in "The Simpsons" and other animated shows and films. References to A113 can also be found in video games. Chances are, if an alum from the California Institute of the Arts is somehow involved, A113 will be included in the animation. 

That's because A113 is the classrooms used by the graphic design and animation students at the school, including John Lasseter. 



The real CalArts is located in Southern California.



Fenton's Creamery in Pixar's "Up" is located in Oakland, California.

At the end of the movie, Russell and Carl can be seen eating an ice cream cone on the sidewalk in front of Fenton's Creamery



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

'Finding Dory' is funny and heartbreaking, but it's not better than the original

$
0
0

finding dory

You’re going to cry, then laugh, then cry some more, but you'll mostly laugh while watching "Finding Dory."

If you're worried that the film — centered around the titular Blue Tang — will be a mere rehash of Pixar’s first movie, don’t be. The sequel to "Finding Nemo" is a nostalgic return to Pixar’s glory after a stumble with last fall’s gorgeous, but underwhelming "The Good Dinosaur."

Taking place a year after the events of 2003’s "Nemo" (yes, "Finding Nemo" is 13 years old!), Dory (Ellen DeGeneres) sets off to find her parents after a conversation triggers a brief memory of her mom and dad.

Just like in the first film, Dory must first get lost in order to complete her mission, but "Finding Dory" is not just about finding the Blue Tang. The movie is about helping Dory, who suffers from short-term memory loss, discover who she is and where she fits into the world.

finding dory

If you grew up with "Finding Nemo," chances are you already love Dory for her easy-going, silly personality. But when you learn the story behind how she became who she is, your heart will melt and you’ll fall in love with her all over again. (Cue the tissues.)

For adults, the film sensitively tackles what it’s like having a child with a disability. So, yes, expect the tear ducts to well. In one of many flashback sequences, Dory’s parents are seen teaching the young fish mnemonic devices like rhymes and songs to help her remember little things. Though some light jokes are inserted into the scene, it’s also heartbreaking watching the small fish struggle to recall items she was told moments ago while her parents look on with worried faces.

finding dory

It can frightening. It can be scary. But a disability is not what should define a person and it doesn’t mean that it’s any reason to hold an individual back. As the film says, Dory just does things in a Dory way, celebrating the phrase "What would Dory Do?" It’s a message many parents will find comforting.

But enough about what's sad in the film. "Finding Dory" is much more funny than heartbreaking, and I’d even dare say funnier than the original since it’s told widely from the perspective of the upbeat Dory.

It’s hard to not get caught up in her mis-remembering words, making silly whale noises, and singing that infectious song about swimming, swimming, swimming.

And it’s not just Dory to get excited about. Just as the seagulls were a fan favorite in the first film, get ready for an entire new crop of sea mammals Dory stumbles upon at the Marine Life Institute, a rehabilitation center for fish and sea animals. Kids will probably want plush stuffed animals of Destiny, a nearsighted whale shark, and one of the cute sea otters featured briefly in the movie. 

finding dory whales

finding dory otters

There's a black-feathered bird named Becky — who may spring some sort of meme after the launch of Beyonce’s recent album with the memorable line, "Becky with the good hair"— as well as a cameo from Sigourney Weaver that becomes an enjoyable running gag in the film.

The best new addition to the cast is a cantankerous octopus by the name of Hank who winds up being an old softee. He’s voiced by Ed O’Neill of "Modern Family," and for whatever reason, the marina workers are really awful at keeping track of his whereabouts.

finding dory

Perhaps the most arresting part of the film comes during a major plot revelation. I won’t give anything away, but the way in which the movie illustrates the process of someone in shock makes you feel as if it’s happening to yourself. The entire sequence could be the start for some spinoff ride based on the film.

Despite being an overall good sequel, there are two things that can get a little exhausting while watching "Finding Dory." Dory is constantly recalling memories from her past in flashback sequences. I’m aware that certain events, phrases, and songs have the ability to trigger memories, but for a fish who has short-term memory loss and had a difficult time recalling anything a year ago in "Finding Nemo," she sure is able to remember a lot all of a sudden.

finding dory

Fish also just keep getting taken in "Finding Dory." It's not just a one time thing. By the third time it occurs, your suspension of disbelief wears thin to the point where you may find yourself asking, "Really? We’re going to do this again?"

You roll with it, but it’s in that final turn late in the film where the sequel slightly jumps the shark. The movie takes an odd over-the-top turn in its final minutes that feels like it would have been better suited in an animated Disney TV series like "Ducktales," but felt too silly and out of place for a Pixar movie. For that reason, I have a tough time saying this is better than "Finding Nemo."

Still, if you’re looking for the perfect "Father’s Day" movie, this is the one to see. No one is going to leave "Dory" feeling unsatisfied. Not only is it a story about finding Dory's family, it's also about realizing the family you’re looking for may have been right beside you all along.

Check out the trailer below:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Meet the genius behind all your favorite Pixar and Disney movies

'Finding Dory' perfectly captures what makes Pixar so great

$
0
0

Finding Dory

"Finding Dory," the long-awaited follow-up to 2003's "Finding Nemo," lives up to the hype.

Set one year after "Finding Nemo,""Finding Dory" finds Marlin (Albert Brooks), Nemo (Hayden Rolence), and Dory (Ellen DeGeneres) living together in harmony in the coral reef. That is, until one day Dory, still suffering from short-term memory loss, suddenly has memories of her long lost parents. 

"Finding Dory" stands out as a great sequel because it is a continuation, rather than just a repeat of the original. It is a brand new story that also allows characters you maybe grew up with to change and grow.

"Finding Dory" is great because it shows what Pixar is best at: creating great characters.

It sounds simple, but it's not easy to do, and it's what makes "Finding Dory" succeed as both a sequel and a movie.

Dory is more than just a fish with short-term memory loss.

finding dory

It would have been easy to make Dory a one-note character. Sure, there are some jokes at her expense. But the movie always highlights not just her downfalls, but her abilities. For instance, she knows that an octopus has three hearts and, for some reason, she can speak whale.

Instead of feeling like a cash grab, this sequel is used to dive into her backstory. We learn that Dory is a misfit, hopping around from school of fish to another her whole life. Learning all this makes both "Dory" and "Nemo" all the better.

Even the most minor characters are important.

finding dory

"Finding Dory" replaces nearly all the characters from the original with new characters, including a stubborn and angry octopus (Ed O'Neill), two goofy whales, and a trio of sea lions. I could watch a spin-off starring any of these characters, and that's how you know they're good. 

Every character has a story.

Take for instance, the three sea lions. Fluke (Idris Elba) and Rudder (Dominic West) have one simple objective in the movie: to hang out on a rock and keep off a third, very weird seal. That is their whole story, and like Dory's, it could have been a one-note gag. Instead, it feels like a short movie tucked within a larger movie. 

There's also a great scene where Marlin and Nemo end up in a pond with a lonely clam.

The clam mentions that he's been alone for years and that his wife left him. It's a funny, fleeting moment but the fact that the directors and writing team decided to give a backstory to even the most minor character says so much about how much Pixar cares. It doesn't further the plot, but it makes the movie richer.

This is what separates Pixar from everyone else.

Finding Dory

Pixar has a knack of populating its worlds with living, breathing characters. They made you empathetic for toys in "Toy Story" and personified emotions in "Inside Out." Making animals talk is nothing new. Disney just did this in March with "Zootopia."

What largely makes "Finding Dory" so watchable, and so fun, is its profound respect for every living creature's story. That should be the Pixar motto. Even the smallest background character can find its way into your heart.

"Finding Dory" will be out in theaters on June 17.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: NASA released the sharpest photos of Pluto in history — and they're spectacular

REVIEW: 'Finding Dory' lacks the magic of the original, but it's still a lot of fun

$
0
0

finding dory disney pixar final

Warning: mild spoilers for "Finding Dory" below.

It's been 13 years since Pixar introduced us to Marlin, his son Nemo, and their absent-minded friend Dory in "Finding Nemo," an animated hit that felt like it took over the world when it came out. And finally director Andrew Stanton (also of "Wall-E") has given us a sequel. 

"Finding Dory" takes us back to the bottom of the ocean a year after Marlin (Albert Brooks) went on his adventure to find Nemo and gained a friend in Dory (Ellen DeGeneres). But this time the focus shifts to Dory, who even though she suffers from memory loss has flashes of the past, which have made her realize she has parents and lost them years ago.

Pixar, like the Disney of the old days, is never shy to pull the heartstrings, and this movie is no different. Flashbacks of an adorably wide-eyed baby Dory with her parents (Eugene Levy and Diane Keaton) struggling to hold onto her memories, and eventually alone in the open water with no clue of her parents' whereabouts, are heartbreaking.

But these memories serve a purpose: motivating Dory to seek out her parents. With the area where she once lived fresh in her mind, she, along with Marlin and Nemo, sets out to find her family.

The movie is slow out of the starting gate, but finally takes off after the trio arrives at the Marine Life Institute in California and begins to interact with the sea life there. The appearance of ill-tempered octopus Hank (Ed O'Neill) is a triumph of not just CGI animation, but a well-written character who is the polar opposite of the babbling Dory.

finding doryAs Dory is split from Marlin and Nemo, we move back and forth from Dory's search for her parents and the clownfish searching for Dory. Funny predicaments occur to both until finally they meet back toward the end, just in time for a satisfying finale.

"Finding Dory" certainly doesn't break any new ground in terms of story or subjects tackled. And it certainly doesn't have the magic of "Finding Nemo," which hit a home run with every plot point and character.

There's still a lot to enjoy about "Finding Dory"— the near-sighted whale shark Destiny (Kaitlin Olson) and beluga whale Bailey (Ty Burrell) are hysterically fun, and the recurring joke of a celebrity as the voice of the institute never gets old — but the overcoming of all odds and fears that made us love "Nemo" doesn't have the same punch in "Dory."

Still, it's great to see the gang back together.

"Finding Dory" opens on Friday in theaters.

SEE ALSO: RANKED: Every Pixar movie from worst to best

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 4 things you might have missed on this week's 'Game of Thrones'

Every Pixar movie, ranked — here's how 'Finding Dory' stacks up

$
0
0

pixar logo

Not since Walt Disney has there been a figure in the animation world who has transcended the medium like John Lasseter and the studio he oversees, Pixar.

Yes, Jeffrey Katzenberg and DreamWorks Animation had their time, but for over 20 years, Lasseter's Pixar has consistently put out box-office hits (the company has earned close to $10 billion worldwide) and created stories that affect us on an emotional level that we can't wait to experience again and again.

From the "you've got a friend" tale of the "Toy Story" movies to a commentary on how we need to protect our planet in the multilayered "WALL-E," Pixar movies are much more than kids' movies or cartoons. Which is exactly how ol' Walt went about it.

Now that we've seen Pixar's latest, "Finding Dory" (out June 17), we've taken on the gargantuan task of ranking all 17 Pixar releases including "Dory"— scroll down to find out how the sequel stacks up and what's the best of them all.

SEE ALSO: 18 movies that never got a sequel but deserve one

17. 'Cars 2' (2011)

Taking Lightning McQueen (voiced by Owen Wilson) and Mater (Larry the Cable Guy) away from Radiator Springs and going international (plus making Mater a spy) didn't grab critics. This sequel became the first "rotten" Pixar movie on Rotten Tomatoes. Deservedly.

  



16. 'A Bug’s Life' (1998)

In the second movie ever released by Pixar, an ant named Flik (voiced by Dave Foley) sets out to find others to help save his colony against grasshoppers and ends up recruiting a unique group of allies.

Though the movie was successful at the box office, with the release of DreamWorks' "Antz" a month earlier, you're more likely to remember the Lasseter-Katzenberg feud than the films. 

 



15. 'The Good Dinosaur' (2015)

Perhaps one of the more serious stories in the Pixar inventory, this coming-of-age tale about an Apatosaurus and his human friend Spot trying to return home didn't catch on nearly as much as Pixar's other release in 2015, "Inside Out."

Burnout may have been at play here, but mostly Pixar challenged its core audience with a darker story than they were used to.

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Pixar has 4 more movies planned after 'Finding Dory' — here they all are

$
0
0

finding dory

It’s been 13 years since Disney and Pixar released the original film “Finding Nemo.” This weekend, fans will return to the ocean when its sequel, “Finding Dory,” comes to theaters.

It’s the latest in a string of classic Pixar movies to be receiving sequels in the next few years. After “Finding Dory” there are a few sequels in store.

From a family with super powers to the toys that started it all, keep reading to see all the upcoming movies Pixar has planned.

SEE ALSO: In the next few decades, fish in huge swaths of the ocean could be struggling to breathe

Next summer we'll get "Cars 3" where we'll see the return of the red hot Lightning McQueen voiced by Owen Wilson.



The film will be the follow-up to Pixar's worst-reviewed movie "Cars 2" which followed McQueen and Mater and their travels abroad.



The next film will return to its roots, reflecting on McQueen's relationship with his former mentor Doc Hudson (Paul Newman) from the original 2006 film.

Source: EW



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Pixar's most and least successful movies at the box office, ranked

$
0
0

pixar logo

With the release of its 17th film, "Finding Dory," on June 17, Pixar will likely continue the box-office domination that began with the release of its first film, "Toy Story," in 1995.

Though each Pixar film released has made the studio a substantial net profit, not every movie has lived up to the immense success of some of the company's true blockbuster hits.

Using Box Office Mojo's and The Numbers' sales and production statistics for each film, Business Insider has ranked all 16 Pixar movies so far by their inflation-adjusted net profit, to keep things on an even playing field (so, subtracting budget from box-office gross) to determine which film was the most financially successful of its time. (The formula doesn't take into account marketing and other costs, however, so net profits are actually likely smaller.)

Accordingly, we adjusted all global box-office receipts and budgets for inflation through 2016 using the US inflation calculator.

Read on to see which Pixar film came out on top, and which landed at the bottom of the heap:

SEE ALSO: Every Pixar movie, ranked — here's how 'Finding Dory' stacks up

16. "The Good Dinosaur" (2015) - Adjusted net profit: $158.3 million

Adjusted gross: 335 million

Unadjusted gross: 331.9 million

Adjusted budget: 176.7 million

Unadjusted budget: 175 million*

*Note: Pixar never officially disclosed budget information for "The Good Dinosaur," but the LA Times reported that the budget was estimated between $175 million and $200 million. Given the lowest possible budget, this film was still the least financially successful.



15. "A Bug's Life" (1998) - Adjusted net profit: $357.3 million

Adjusted gross: 533.4 million

Unadjusted gross: 363.4 million

Adjusted budget: 176.1 million

Unadjusted budget: 120 million



14. "Brave" (2012) - Adjusted net profit: $368.9 million

Adjusted gross: 533.4 million

Unadjusted gross: 363.4 million

Adjusted budget: 176.1 million

Unadjusted budget: 120 million



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Disney has been hiding a secret message in its movies for years

$
0
0

Woody, Toy Story, number

Pixar has been known for its Easter eggs — hidden messages in films — but one of its best has to do with A113.

The letter and numbers can be found in almost all of Pixar's films, from "Toy Story" to "Cars."

It's also in Disney and Pixar's newest release, "Finding Dory," out this weekend toward the film's end.

What does it mean?

Pixar's John Lasseter has explained A113 is the number of the animation classroom at the California Institute of the Arts.

Many animators like Lasseter attended school there, and by including the number they are giving a subtle shout-out to their alma mater.

Pixar animators

The number has been used for many different things in Pixar films, such as a license plate in 1995's "Toy Story," seen above.

It was on a camera in 2003's "Finding Nemo."

finding nemo, number

A113 is also the number of a train in 2006's "Cars."

train, cars, number

You can find it on a box that Flik walks by in 1998's "A Bug's Life."

a bugs life, number

Here's Sully from 2013's "Monsters University" entering a classroom whose number is A113.

monsters university sulley

However, Pixar films aren't the only ones to hide the number in plain sight. Here's Tiana from Disney's 2009 "The Princess and the Frog" jumping on a trolley car marked A113.

Princess and the frog, number

"The Simpsons" used it for Bart Simpson's mug shot.

the simpsons, number

It even shows up on a door in 1987's "The Brave Little Toaster."Joe Ranft, who went on to work on Pixar movies including "Toy Story,""A Bug's Life," and "Monsters, Inc.," and Dan Haskett, a character designer on "Toy Story," worked on the film.

the brave little toaster

You can also notice the number on a chewed-up vehicle in Warner Bros.' 1999 movie "The Iron Giant." The director, Brad Bird, later made Pixar hit "The Incredibles."the iron giant a113

Even live-action films like 2012's "The Avengers" had a file labeled A113.

the avengers, number

In "Finding Dory," look out for a truck at the Marine Life Institute. It's license plates feature the popular A113. The sequel is in theaters Friday, June 17.

Frank Pallotta contributed to an original version of this story.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 'The Little Prince' trailer looks better than anything Pixar has made in years

The short film ​before 'Finding Dory' is absolutely gorgeous — it's Pixar's best yet

$
0
0

piper pixar

If you head out to see "Finding Dory" this weekend, you'll also see "Piper," Pixar's newest short film.

While the six-minute short about a fledgling sandpiper hatchling is adorable and will resonate with both adults and children alike, it’s the animation that steals the show. “Piper” is absolutely stunning.

The dialogue-free short introduces us to the wide-eyed baby bird as he’s being trained by his mother to get food on his own from an incoming ocean tide. We watch as Piper scurries hurriedly down a beach towards the water and that’s when you realize you’re watching something special.

"Piper" animates what are probably two of the most difficult things to illustrate and make look realistic — sand and water.

Just look at these shots:

piper sandpiper sand pixar

And it’s not just regular sand that’s animated, but wet sand. And it all looks incredibly real.

sandpiper bird piperpiper pixarpiper bubble

If you’ve ever stepped in sand, you know it’s not simply one color. It’s made up of billions and billions of tiny specks that are shades of brown, orange, white, and even black. Pixar took all of that into consideration to create pebbles of sand so detailed that you may as well be looking at real grains of sand.

"Piper" director Alan Barillaro told Business Insider's Jason Guerrasio it took over a year and a half to do the animation on the latest Pixar short. Why? Barillaro estimates there were billions of sand pebbles animated to create the beach.

He also said there were about seven million feathers individually created for the sandpipers. Up to 40 animators spent time drawing almost everything the old-fashioned way, by hand.

So when you're watching "Piper," yes, you are watching a labor of love. Check out a teaser of "Piper" below:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Netflix just saved 'The Little Prince' — and its trailer rivals anything Pixar has made in years

The Pixar director behind 'Inside Out' had one key skill that helped the film succeed

$
0
0

inside out

When Pixar recruited the psychologist Dacher Keltner to consult on the 2015 film "Inside Out," they were hoping Keltner would lend his expertise on human emotion.

The film invites viewers on a journey inside the mind of an 11-year-old girl, Riley, after she moves with her family to a new city; the emotions of joy, sadness, fear, disgust, and anger all take the form of animated characters.

But Keltner, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, also studies power dynamics — his new book is titled "The Power Paradox." And he couldn't help but scrutinize the way Pete Docter, the film's director, managed his team.

When I spoke with Keltner recently, he told me that the award-winning film's success is largely attributable to Docter's leadership style — specifically, his willingness to listen to other people's ideas.

Keltner cited one moment in particular that illustrated Docter's openness to outside perspectives. The big question hanging over the Pixar team was whether Joy should band with Sadness or Fear to save Riley's personality.

In his gut, Keltner said, Docter felt that Joy and Sadness should go together, but a group of senior executives were rooting for Fear.

Instead of making a quick, unilateral decision, Keltner said Docter held "the intensest conversations" about the role of different emotions.

At one point, Keltner walked around the Pixar campus with Docter and co-director Ronnie del Carmen, and the three were "just engaging in this really deep conversation about what is sadness and how does it differ from depression and what happens if young kids see this?"

Meanwhile, Docter was gathering observations from his family and from other members of the Pixar team. Ultimately, he decided to choose Sadness to accompany Joy on the journey.

inside out riley"It really struck me," Keltner told me, "just the openness of his inquiry into that decision. And I think that's one of the things we've learned about great leadership, is people who go around and really get the best ideas from the people around them to make these critical decisions" are the ones who succeed.

In "The Power Paradox," Keltner writes that listening is a key way to practice empathy — and that empathy is the surprising route to power and influence. He cites research suggesting that teams led by empathetic managers are more productive, innovative, and satisfied with their work.

Moreover, Keltner writes that power comes from empowering others. He highlights Charles Darwin as a prime example: The scientist wrote hundreds of letters every year to individuals as varied as missionaries and neurologists, in order to collect ideas that he synthesized in his own writings.

Ultimately, Keltner told me, "the more wisdom you get from more people, you're going to produce better things. And it's the task of the leader to go get that information."

SEE ALSO: The 'cookie monster' study reveals how power corrupts people

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A Harvard psychologist says this is key to being more confident and powerful

The director of the great new Pixar short 'Piper' reveals the painstaking 3-year process to make it

$
0
0

Piper Disney Pixar

Less than a mile from Pixar Studios in Emeryville, California, there's a calming stretch of beach that animator Alan Barillaro visits often. Three years ago, while walking along that Pacific shore, Barillaro came on an idea that has become the latest great Pixar work.

It's "Piper," the short film showing before "Finding Dory," which is out Friday.

At the time Barillaro, 41, was heavily involved in what Pixar calls a “Tools” session. It’s when animators basically spend time messing around with the company’s proprietary software to see the ways they can implement new tools for their projects.

Barillaro didn’t get into specifics of the session when he talked to Business Insider recently, but Pixar CCO John Lassetter wasn’t that into it anyway. But the character Barillaro created for the test had promise.

Starting out with the crow from “Brave,” Barillaro transformed that into one of the tiny sandpiper birds he saw constantly on his trips to the beach running back and forth from the tide.

With the encouragement of Lasseter and “Finding Dory” director Andrew Stanton, Barillaro found himself working on storyboards about the sandpiper.

“I got to be totally honest,” Barillaro told Business Insider, “it was outside all of the normal development structure of the studio.”

Barillaro, who has been at Pixar since he was 18, has worked on almost every level at the studio — animator on "Monsters, Inc.," supervising animator on "The Incredibles" and "Brave"— but having never directed before, he was searching for advice.

“I assumed with directing, I would get the secrets of how to do it from Andrew and John, the tools they use to guide themselves,” but then he realized something else about those filmmakers' talent.

“What I found I was lacking was how personal they take their work and being honest in what you’re trying to say,” Barillaro said.

He spent a year with storyboard artists trying to formulate his sandpiper, which he named Piper. What he came up with was a baby sandpiper who is no longer being fed by his mother, so he has to overcome his fear of the water to get his own meals.

Piper Disney Pixar finalLasseter was impressed by the progress and greenlit the project to be Pixar’s latest short for "Dory."

Barillaro said it was working with Stanton as animation supervisor on “WALL-E” that made him understand how to make a compelling and personal six-minute short about a sandpiper and his mother with absolutely zero dialogue.

“People have to remember, when we start these things, we have no idea how we’ll pull it off,” Barillaro said. “I remember reading the script for ‘WALL-E’ and going to Andrew’s office and reading act one and couldn’t believe we were going to tell a love story between two robots with no dialogue. I felt I was taking lessons learned from that film and applying them to mine.”

It took just over a year and a half to do the animation for “Piper,” which included close to 7 million feathers created for the sandpipers and billions of sand pebbles to make up the beach.

“At some point you just realize numbers haven’t been created to count how many we did,” Barillaro said of the sand pebbles.

But seeing as “Piper” was born from a Tools session, Barillaro wanted to push the animation technology at Pixar as far as he could. The short uses the new render software that Stanton also used in “Finding Dory,” and to get the sandpiper feathers and the rushing tide to look right, animators — who totaled up to 40 — did almost everything by hand, as opposed to having the software create simulations.

Alan Barillaro Deborah Coleman Pixar.JPG“We pushed the rendering power to its limit in this film,” Barillaro said.

But with all Pixar projects, short or long, focus on the story is paramount. And Barillaro’s biggest challenge was finding a way to have Piper and his mother carry a conversation without it looking too human.

Dialogue that was written by Barillaro guided the team initially, but by year three of production, they had to figure out how to make Piper and his mom communicate on their own.

“I was very passionate about not humanizing the story and not going to gestures that are very human, like using hands,” Barillaro said. “One time I asked the animator to do a head shake for the bird, like a human saying ‘no.’ And what I appreciated was a note that John gave me saying, ‘I know it’s hard, but look for another gesture.’ His encouragement to keep looking and not going for the easy one, that meant a lot.”

Barillaro finally handed off “Piper” a few weeks ago — literally hours before the deadline to have the short attached to “Finding Dory” when it plays in theaters. He admits it’s a bittersweet feeling.

“It’s the moment you feel you know how to do it,” he said.

But he also knows that at Pixar, there’s always something else to tackle.

“You come back to the office the next day and after all those years being a bird, now you have to be a monster or a fish,” he said.

Watch a clip from “Piper” below:

SEE ALSO: RANKED: Every Pixar movie from worst to best

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Meet the genius behind all your favorite Pixar and Disney movies

Viewing all 340 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>